In terms of conducting and writing about your
own research, the ability to synthesize past research demonstrates that
you have read the appropriate background information on your chosen
topic, and have used the information contained within the articles to generate
ideas and hypotheses to be tested. Your synthesis paper is similar
to, but not as extensive as, a "literature review" like the one's you read
in the first part of journal articles.
| You must choose articles written using empirical research (i.e., experiments, surveys, interviews, etc.). Some of the communication journals include historical essays and pieces of rhetorical or film criticism. Though historical/critical research is a legitimate part of the field of communication, these types of articles will not work for this assignment. If you are not sure whether an article is appropriate for this assignment, please check with me. If you choose an article that is not of the correct type, you will lose points. |
Topic Selection
It will be difficult to complete Paper #2 (or Paper #3) if you do not have a relatively good idea of the question(s) you want to address. Researchers usually do literature reviews to demonstrate that they have gained "adequate knowledge" about their subject area, that the hypotheses they have formulated have not already been tested and that there are good reasons for doing the research. In your third paper, you will take the information from your synthesis paper and propose some hypotheses and methods for testing them. This means that you should have some idea about that now to make your synthesis fit what you will do later.
Analytical Methods
There are a number of alternatives you can use to help you pull the ideas of your different articles together. The idea is to find a way to make the articles "fit together." You may want to (but do not have to) try one of the following organizational methods:
|
Working with a Group or Individually
If you would like to, you can choose to work with 1-2 others in your class on the remaining paper assignments for this class. Although working with others is not required, I encourage you to do so for a variety of reasons. Working with a "team" is a common way that much scholarly research is conducted. This contributes to the ability to investigate your topic more thoroughly because you will have a larger number of total articles from which to draw conclusions and ground your ideas. Ideally, working with others can result in increased creativity and product quality because of the multiple perspectives represented by you and your team members.
Here are the basic requirements for Paper #2
if you choose to work alone:
For this assignment, you should choose a minimum
of 4 articles in scholarly journals (similar to the one used for Paper
#1), which may include the article you abstracted for Paper #1 if it is
relevant. The paper should be 4-6 double-spaced pages, and use correct
APA citation and formatting.
Here are the basic requirements for Paper #2
if you choose to work in a group of two:
For this assignment, you should choose a minimum
of 6 articles in scholarly journals (similar to the one used for Paper
#1). You may include the article abstracted for Paper #1 if
it is relevant. The paper should be 5-7 double-spaced pages, and
use correct APA citation and formatting.
Here are the basic requirements for Paper #2
if you choose to work in a group of three:
For this assignment, you should choose a minimum
of 8 articles in scholarly journals (similar to the one used for Paper
#1). You may include the article abstracted for Paper #1 if
it is relevant. The paper should be 6-8 double-spaced pages, and
use correct APA citation and formatting.
In order to address what is probably the most
common complaint about group work–lack of participation by a group member
or members–each member will need to turn in the rough drafts of their contribution
to the paper along with the final draft of each paper.
*
If you'd like to see examples of the Synthesis Paper Assignment
|